close

Log-in here for All Access Areas >

forgotten password? Get your free VOX pass >

 

VOX | Discussion Forums » Effect & Pedals » ToneLab

 

Why Riddles instead of stating Amps/Pedals models?

Started 10 months ago by zoltanv

Topic Rating:


 

zoltanv

Member

 

Is there any problem on Vox's side to just state clearly and straightforward what models of Amps and Pedals they model ? e.g. in their Tonelab series (or other modeling amps of course). What is the big issue to state clearly that amp setting so-and-so is aimed at modeling a particular Marshall JCM or a Mesa Boogie rectifier or a Fender Bassman? Why the secrecy, why the riddles? Each time I read an operating manual my IQ needs to drop to room temperature (in Celsius of course), to match the level of these silly descriptions. What a waste of print and time - Can't it just be listed clearly in a table....???


Posted 10 months ago

 

voxman

VOX Forum Moderator

voxman
 

Agreed. Vox will likely tell you its to do with copyright, but if Line 6 and others can state the amps modelled, I don't see why Vox can't.


Posted 10 months ago

 

lusthaben

Member

 

copyright and trademark law vary from country to country quite quite widely and Vox is very protective of their trademarks, so thus they are shy about infringing on someone else copywrite. .

Here's a tidbit. . .where a company sells Vox pattern grillcloth there is often a statement that the design is owned by Vox and must be used only to clothe Vox products!!!

I don't blame them either, there are companies that make amps that are basically copies of earlier Vox amp designs. . .Vox wouldn't want them to also use materials that allow them to mimic Vox products.


Posted 10 months ago

 

zoltanv

Member

 

Yes - I noticed that the Boss BC-2 is supposed to mimic a Vox AC30, but they don't state it clearly anywhere in THEIR user manual except that it is supposed to model a venerable British Combo Amp etc etc ....

Still If they (Vox now) "quote" another brand name and say their amps/pedals "model" or "attempt to copy the sound of" that's not really a copyright infringement in my view - it depends on how they state the issue. Wouldn't it rather be "giving credit" to (even advertizing for) the original developer of a "characteristic sound" (which for musicians is really the "primary product")?

Anyhow - thanks for your thoughts - it would of course also be interesting if someone from the company would weigh in on the question.


Posted 10 months ago

 

voxman

VOX Forum Moderator

voxman
 

Lusthaben, I think you've probably hit the nail on the head.

But, and this just my 2c worth, I suspect Vox' approach is very much historical, going back to when modeling was newer and there was a 'divide' between modeling manufacturers (I think Line 6 was the first to bring out a modeling amp) & traditional amp manufacturers.

Nowadays modeling is very firmly established and its all intermingled by which I mean that modeling companies like Line 6 are now using valves, teaming up with Bogner, and 'traditional' amp manufacturers are now big on modeling to run side-by-side with traditional valve products.

Vox, Fender (Mustang), Peavey (Vypyr), Laney (Prism), Highes & Kettner (Zentera, Zen Amp) are all examples of the latter. So I don't think this is as sensitive an issue as it once was - & if Line 6 who market globally (& AxeFX) haven't been sued by anyone for disclosing the amps and effects being modelled, I really don't think this over cautious cloak & dagger approach needs to be continued.

In any event, the descriptions used by Vox (as an example) are largely (albeit not always) a giveaway - so you could argue that those descriptions on their own are enough to cause a copy-right issue anyway!

So, with no-one being sued after all these years I think it's time for companies to stop being frightened by their paranoid lawyers - and as long its clear that all you're doing is modeling the amp & not creating a real live version to sell, I really can't see why there is still a reluctance to quote the amp or effect being modelled.

Even Behringer, renowned for (shall we charitably say) being 'imaginatively re-inventive' in their product approach (where any similarity to other products on the market is of course wholly accidental!) have never been successfully sued for any alleged copy-right breach!

Anyway, reinforcing Lusthabens observation, surely manufacturers should be flattered that their products are worthy of being modelled. I mean, what great cross marketing - a Fender Mustang user buys an AC30 because he loves the AC30 tone & wants the real thing (or vice-a-versa with a Valvetronix owner to a Fender Bassman etc). As I said, it's all intermingled now.


Posted 10 months ago

 

 

Actually the originator of physical modeling is the Yamaha corp. in the synth realm. There have been many guitar products using digital "means" to recreate analog sounds (and distortion in particular). You have to hand Korg the crown for coming up with digital distortion with oversampling, ToneWorks G1 guitar processor. Way before some ingenious fellow at Line6 labeled it as "modeling"... ;-)


Posted 10 months ago

 

lusthaben

Member

 

The Vox look is a very important part of their branding. If someone copies their look, Vox will take them to court. . .but guess what. If the defendant can show that Vox is copying someone else in any major visible way, such as naming the amps they are emulating, that weakens their standing in court and will probably result in immediate dismissal in the lawsuit.


Posted 10 months ago

 

voxman

VOX Forum Moderator

voxman
 

Quite right Thomas - the first modeling amps you're refering to were for keyboard and Bass. I should have been more precise - I meant to say that Line 6 was the first to bring out a modeling GUITAR amp, which was the AXSys212, brought out in 1996.


Posted 10 months ago

 

rumpeller

Member

 

The reason I bought an AC30HW2X is because I previously had a Line 6 POD HD500 and tried all the amp models on it. I kept returning to the AC 30 and AC30 TB models above all other amps, so the obvious step was to get myself a genuine Vox AC30. It's going to be a keeper; I just don't need any other amps. If it wasn't for amp modeling I wouldn't be on this forum.


Posted 10 months ago

 

RSS feed for this topic

 

You must be logged in to post.